"Iran is the single biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the world" declared new Defence Secretary, James Mattis.
His boss, President Trump says "They are the number one terrorist state. They're sending money all over the place - and weapons. And they can't do that."
It is true that the mainstream media are ready to parrot this claim endlessly. But where is the evidence? Perhaps Trump is right and the media are lying shamelessly.
If Hezbollah is to be labelled a terrorist group, because of some -past actions, then so should the Likud government of Israel) because of the terrorism of the Haganah, and Sterne Gang out of which it grew), not to mention the ANC government in South Africa, and perhaps even the US government too (no doubt Britain saw the Boston Tea Party as a terrorist act).
And then there is the supposed support of Houthis in Yemen.
Saudi Arabia claims that they are backed by Iran, but as far as I can tell have offered no evidence. The fact that they adhere to some weak form of the Shi'a belief seems to be enough for the claim that they are Iranian puppets. Besides they are involved in a civil war in which Saudi Arabia has intervened viciously, so the Houthis hardly constitute terrorists.
And this brings us to the real Champions in the Terrorist Sponsorship League - Saudi Arabia. Were not 15 of the 9-11 hijackers Saudi nationals? There have been many allegations that they were supported by members of the Saud royal family. And of course they have been happily sponsoring jihadi groups in Syria and elsewhere.
So please, don't buy into the propaganda coming from the new US administration - it is the same as much of what was being said by the last government, but I don't think Obama really believed it.
Of course it is what Israel would like the world to believe (and Saudi). They failed in stopping the Obama administration reaching a deal with Iran over nuclear weapons. Now it seems like someone is trying to revive the hostility.
Will Trump go along? Or will he follow his campaign rhetoric about not getting involved in useless military entanglements in the Middle East. We have to hope the latter.